Which of the following is an effect of joinder?

The selection that states joinder can streamline the resolution of related claims is appropriate because one of the fundamental purposes of joinder in civil procedure is to allow for the efficient handling of cases with multiple claims or parties. When related claims are combined in a single lawsuit, the court can address overlapping issues and facts in one hearing, thereby reducing the time and resources needed for multiple trials on similar matters. This efficiency helps prevent inconsistent judgments and promotes a cohesive approach to resolving disputes that involve interconnected legal issues or parties.

The other potential effects do not accurately capture the primary benefits associated with joinder. For example, while joinder can sometimes unintentionally lead to enhanced complexity in a case, it is primarily designed to facilitate easier and faster resolutions rather than create new subject matter jurisdiction. Additionally, joinder does not inherently alter the statute of limitations for claims; each claim generally remains subject to the original time frames established by law. Finally, joinder does not eliminate the need for evidence; all parties are still required to present their evidence to support their claims and defenses.