What may the failure to join a necessary party result in?

The correct answer highlights that the failure to join a necessary party can lead to the court's inability to grant complete relief in the case. This occurs because, without all necessary parties, the court might be unable to adjudicate all aspects of the dispute or issue a ruling that binds all relevant parties. For instance, if a party whose interests are crucial to the resolution of the case is not joined, the court may only be able to provide partial relief that could ultimately leave unresolved legal questions or result in conflicting obligations.

This situation underscores the principle that when pursuing claims, it is essential to include all necessary parties to ensure a comprehensive resolution and to prevent later complications or claims of unfairness. If a necessary party is not involved, it can compromise the integrity of the judgment and potentially lead to further litigation.

In contrast, the possibility of complete resolution of all claims does not take into account the repercussions of omitting a necessary party, while automatic dismissal of all claims is too severe a consequence for simply failing to join a party—unless specific statutory or procedural rules dictate otherwise. As for an increase in the chances of settlement, this may vary and is not a direct outcome of the failure to join a necessary party; instead, it can depend on various factors unrelated