How does the unwillingness of existing parties to represent an intervenor's interest affect the intervention process?

The intervention process allows a non-party to join ongoing litigation under certain conditions, primarily when they have an interest that may be affected by the outcome of the case. When existing parties are unwilling to represent the intervenor's interests, this circumstance significantly influences the court's evaluation of the intervention request.

In such situations, the court is more likely to find that intervention is warranted. The unwillingness of the existing parties suggests that the intervenor's perspective or stake in the matter may not be adequately represented, reinforcing the necessity for the intervenor to enter the lawsuit. This aligns with the purpose of intervention, which is to ensure that all parties with a substantial interest in the litigation can present their case effectively.

If existing parties are not advocating for the intervenor's position, it creates a strong argument that intervention would serve the interests of justice and promote a more thorough examination of the issues at hand. This scenario highlights the importance of allowing the intervenor to participate and provide input, emphasizing that their unique perspective might be essential for a just resolution of the case, thus supporting the finding that intervention is warranted.

The other options do not account for the fundamental principle that intervention is justified when the current parties cannot adequately represent all interests involved. This reinforces the rationale behind